Please
read the usage
disclaimer for Course Evaluations.
Computer Engineering
Fall Quarter 2002
COEN 120
Mircoproc Based Design
Course Information
Section Number: 26869
Instructor:
Quinn Jr,Neil R
Location: BANNA 105
Class times: : - :
Class Days: TR
Credits (hi/lo): 4.00 -
4.00
Enrollment: 17
Student Responses:
Questions 1 through 11 are rated on a 5-point
scale which described the instructor's teaching procedures:
-1- -2- -3- -4- -5- Total Mean Variance StdDev
1.
The instructor presents class material clearly
0 0 0 6 5 11 4.45 0.25 0.50
2.
The course is well organized
0 0 1 5 5 11 4.36 0.41 0.64
3.
The instructor appears well prepared for class
0 0 0 4 7 11 4.64 0.23 0.48
4.
The instructor demonstrates an interest in students
0 0 0 3 8 11 4.73 0.20 0.45
5.
The instructor is available to students during posted office hours (Respond
only if you have tried to contact the instructor during office hours)
0 0 0 2 4 6 4.67 0.22 0.47
6.
The instructor takes care to assure him/herself by tests, questions,
discussions, etc. that the students are comprehending the subject
0 2 2 5 2 11 3.64 0.96 0.98
7.
The instructor appears to be knowledgable in the subject
0 0 2 2 7 11 4.45 0.61 0.78
8.
The instructor appears to enjoy teaching
0 0 0 1 10 11 4.91 0.08 0.29
9.
The instructor encourages the students to ask questions and/or express
opinions
0 0 0 4 7 11 4.64 0.23 0.48
10.
The course has contributed to my capacity for critical evaluation
0 0 4 2 5 11 4.09 0.81 0.90
11.
The course has stimulated me to do independent thinking
0 0 3 4 4 11 4.09 0.63 0.79
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
Questions 13 through 17 use different scales. The response
scale is listed above each question.
12. The work load for this
course in relation to other courses I have taken at this university is:
much about much
lighter lighter same heavier heavier Total Mean Variance StdDev
0 1 5 4 1 11 3.45 0.61 0.78
13.
My college at Santa Clara is:
science human. engnr. business
0 0 11 0 11 3.00 0.00 0.00
14.
My status at Santa Clara is:
junior frosh
other grad sr. soph
0 1 10 0 11 2.91 0.08 0.29
15.
My primary reason for taking this course was:
req'd electv req'd
free non- for major
electv major reqm't course
1 0 0 9 10 3.70 0.81 0.90
16.
My cumulative Santa Clara grade point average is:
below 2.79 3.29 4.0
2.3 to 2.3 to 2.8 to 3.3
0 3 1 7 11 3.36 0.78 0.88
17.
What percentage of class time were you in attendance?
below 74% 89% 100%
50% to 50% to 75% to 90%
0 0 0 11 11 4.00 0.00 0.00
Number
of response cards read: 11
Notes:
SCU Homepage | Course Evaluations page | Search database | General Help
02-03 Evaluations: Fall | Winter |
Spring
| Summer
01-02 Evaluations: Fall | Winter |
Spring
| Summer
00-01 Evaluations: Fall | Winter |
Spring
| Summer
99-00 Evaluations: Fall | Winter |
Spring
| Summer
98-99 Evaluations: Fall | Winter |
Spring
| Summer
97-98 Evaluations: Fall | Winter |
Spring
| Summer
96-97 Evaluations: Fall | Winter |
Spring
| Summer
95-96 Evaluations: Fall | Winter |
Spring
| Summer
94-95 Evaluations: Fall | Winter |
Spring
| Summer
Maintainer: EvalsManager evalmgr@www.scu.edu
Last
changed: 5 May 2003
© Copyright 1995-2003 Santa Clara University