Please
read the usage
disclaimer for Course Evaluations.
Computer Engineering
Spring Quarter 2003
COEN 120
Mircoproc Based Design
Course Information
Section Number: 31460
Instructor:
Quinn Jr,Neil R
Location: BANNA 106
Class times: : - :
Class Days: TR
Credits (hi/lo): 4.00 -
4.00
Enrollment: 11
Student Responses:
Questions 1 through 11 are rated on a 5-point
scale which described the instructor's teaching procedures:
-1- -2- -3- -4- -5- Total Mean Variance StdDev
1.
The instructor presents class material clearly
0 0 0 3 7 10 4.70 0.21 0.46
2.
The course is well organized
0 0 1 4 5 10 4.40 0.44 0.66
3.
The instructor appears well prepared for class
0 0 0 1 9 10 4.90 0.09 0.30
4.
The instructor demonstrates an interest in students
0 0 0 1 9 10 4.90 0.09 0.30
5.
The instructor is available to students during posted office hours (Respond
only if you have tried to contact the instructor during office hours)
0 0 0 1 6 7 4.86 0.12 0.35
6.
The instructor takes care to assure him/herself by tests, questions,
discussions, etc. that the students are comprehending the subject
0 0 1 4 5 10 4.40 0.44 0.66
7.
The instructor appears to be knowledgable in the subject
0 0 0 1 9 10 4.90 0.09 0.30
8.
The instructor appears to enjoy teaching
0 0 0 1 9 10 4.90 0.09 0.30
9.
The instructor encourages the students to ask questions and/or express
opinions
0 0 0 1 9 10 4.90 0.09 0.30
10.
The course has contributed to my capacity for critical evaluation
0 0 1 3 6 10 4.50 0.45 0.67
11.
The course has stimulated me to do independent thinking
0 0 2 2 6 10 4.40 0.64 0.80
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
Questions 13 through 17 use different scales. The response
scale is listed above each question.
12. The work load for this
course in relation to other courses I have taken at this university is:
much about much
lighter lighter same heavier heavier Total Mean Variance StdDev
0 0 4 5 1 10 3.70 0.41 0.64
13.
My college at Santa Clara is:
science human. engnr. business
0 0 9 0 9 3.00 0.00 0.00
14.
My status at Santa Clara is:
junior frosh
other grad sr. soph
1 2 7 0 10 2.60 0.44 0.66
15.
My primary reason for taking this course was:
req'd electv req'd
free non- for major
electv major reqm't course
2 0 0 8 10 3.40 1.44 1.20
16.
My cumulative Santa Clara grade point average is:
below 2.79 3.29 4.0
2.3 to 2.3 to 2.8 to 3.3
1 1 2 6 10 3.30 1.01 1.00
17.
What percentage of class time were you in attendance?
below 74% 89% 100%
50% to 50% to 75% to 90%
0 0 0 10 10 4.00 0.00 0.00
Number
of response cards read: 10
Notes:
SCU Homepage | Course Evaluations page | Search database | General Help
02-03 Evaluations: Fall | Winter |
Spring
| Summer
01-02 Evaluations: Fall | Winter |
Spring
| Summer
00-01 Evaluations: Fall | Winter |
Spring
| Summer
99-00 Evaluations: Fall | Winter |
Spring
| Summer
98-99 Evaluations: Fall | Winter |
Spring
| Summer
97-98 Evaluations: Fall | Winter |
Spring
| Summer
96-97 Evaluations: Fall | Winter |
Spring
| Summer
95-96 Evaluations: Fall | Winter |
Spring
| Summer
94-95 Evaluations: Fall | Winter |
Spring
| Summer
Maintainer: EvalsManager evalmgr@www.scu.edu
Last
changed: 29 August 2003
© Copyright 1995-2003 Santa Clara University