

Please
read the usage
disclaimer for Course Evaluations.
Engineering
Fall Quarter 2000
ENGR 19
Technological Ethics
Course Information
Section Number: 10113
Instructor:
Quinn Jr,Neil R
Location: BANNA 105
Class times: 11:45 -
12:50
Class Days: MWF
Credits (hi/lo): 4.00 -
4.00
Enrollment: 26
Student Responses:
Questions 1 through 11 are rated on a 5-point
scale which described the instructor's teaching procedures:
-1- -2- -3- -4- -5- Total Mean Variance StdDev
1.
The instructor presents class material clearly
0 2 4 4 16 26 4.31 0.98 0.99
2.
The course is well organized
0 1 2 6 17 26 4.50 0.63 0.80
3.
The instructor appears well prepared for class
0 1 2 4 19 26 4.58 0.63 0.79
4.
The instructor demonstrates an interest in students
0 0 2 6 18 26 4.62 0.39 0.62
5.
The instructor is available to students during posted office hours (Respond
only if you have tried to contact the instructor during office hours)
0 0 1 4 15 20 4.70 0.31 0.56
6.
The instructor takes care to assure him/herself by tests, questions,
discussions, etc. that the students are comprehending the subject
1 0 4 9 12 26 4.19 0.92 0.96
7.
The instructor appears to be knowledgable in the subject
0 0 0 5 21 26 4.81 0.16 0.39
8.
The instructor appears to enjoy teaching
0 0 1 4 21 26 4.77 0.25 0.50
9.
The instructor encourages the students to ask questions and/or express
opinions
0 0 1 5 20 26 4.73 0.27 0.52
10.
The course has contributed to my capacity for critical evaluation
1 0 2 7 16 26 4.42 0.86 0.93
11.
The course has stimulated me to do independent thinking
1 0 2 4 19 26 4.54 0.86 0.93
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
Questions 13 through 17 use different scales. The response
scale is listed above each question.
12. The work load for this
course in relation to other courses I have taken at this university is:
much about much
lighter lighter same heavier heavier Total Mean Variance StdDev
1 11 12 2 0 26 2.58 0.47 0.69
13.
My college at Santa Clara is:
science human. engnr. business
2 1 23 0 26 2.81 0.31 0.56
14.
My status at Santa Clara is:
junior frosh
other grad sr. soph
0 0 13 12 25 3.48 0.25 0.50
15.
My primary reason for taking this course was:
req'd electv req'd
free non- for major
electv major reqm't course
1 1 18 6 26 3.12 0.41 0.64
16.
My cumulative Santa Clara grade point average is:
below 2.79 3.29 4.0
2.3 to 2.3 to 2.8 to 3.3
0 8 5 11 24 3.12 0.78 0.88
17.
What percentage of class time were you in attendance?
below 74% 89% 100%
50% to 50% to 75% to 90%
0 0 0 26 26 4.00 0.00 0.00
Number
of response cards read: 26
Notes:
SCU Page | Course Evaluations Page
| Search Database | General
Help
1994-1995 : Fall | Winter | Spring | Summer
1995-1996
: Fall | Winter | Spring | Summer
1996-1997
: Fall | Winter | Spring | Summer
1997-1998
: Fall | Winter | Spring | Summer
1998-1999
: Fall | Winter | Spring | Summer
1999-2000
: Fall | Winter | Spring | Summer
2000-2001
: Fall
Maintainer: EvalsManager evalmgr@www.scu.edu
Last
changed: 8 February 2001
© Copyright 1995 Santa Clara University