

Please
read the usage
disclaimer for Course Evaluations.
Engineering
Fall Quarter 1999
ENGR 019
TECHNOLOGICAL ETHICS
Course Information
Section Number: 17334
Instructor:
NEIL QUINN
Location: CPPAE 128
Class times: 13:00 -
14:05
Class Days: MWF
Credits (hi/lo): 04.0 -
00.0
Enrollment: 11
Student Responses:
Questions 1 through 11 are rated on a 5-point
scale which described the instructor's teaching procedures:
-1- -2- -3- -4- -5- Total Mean Variance StdDev
1.
The instructor presents class material clearly
0 0 0 5 4 9 4.44 0.25 0.50
2.
The course is well organized
0 0 1 2 7 10 4.60 0.44 0.66
3.
The instructor appears well prepared for class
0 0 1 1 8 10 4.70 0.41 0.64
4.
The instructor demonstrates an interest in students
0 0 1 1 8 10 4.70 0.41 0.64
5.
The instructor is available to students during posted office hours (Respond
only if you have tried to contact the instructor during office hours)
0 0 0 3 3 6 4.50 0.25 0.50
6.
The instructor takes care to assure him/herself by tests, questions,
discussions, etc. that the students are comprehending the subject
0 0 2 3 5 10 4.30 0.61 0.78
7.
The instructor appears to be knowledgable in the subject
0 0 1 3 6 10 4.50 0.45 0.67
8.
The instructor appears to enjoy teaching
0 0 2 1 7 10 4.50 0.65 0.81
9.
The instructor encourages the students to ask questions and/or express
opinions
0 0 1 2 7 10 4.60 0.44 0.66
10.
The course has contributed to my capacity for critical evaluation
0 1 1 1 7 10 4.40 1.04 1.02
11.
The course has stimulated me to do independent thinking
0 1 2 1 6 10 4.20 1.16 1.08
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
Questions 13 through 17 use different scales. The response
scale is listed above each question.
12. The work load for this
course in relation to other courses I have taken at this university is:
much about much
lighter lighter same heavier heavier Total Mean Variance StdDev
0 1 6 1 1 9 3.22 0.62 0.79
13.
My college at Santa Clara is:
science human. engnr. business
2 0 8 0 10 2.60 0.64 0.80
14.
My status at Santa Clara is:
junior frosh
other grad sr. soph
0 0 5 4 9 3.44 0.25 0.50
15.
My primary reason for taking this course was:
req'd electv req'd
free non- for major
electv major reqm't course
0 1 3 5 9 3.44 0.47 0.68
16.
My cumulative Santa Clara grade point average is:
below 2.79 3.29 4.0
2.3 to 2.3 to 2.8 to 3.3
0 0 3 2 5 3.40 0.24 0.49
17.
What percentage of class time were you in attendance?
below 74% 89% 100%
50% to 50% to 75% to 90%
0 0 0 8 8 4.00 0.00 0.00
Number
of response cards read: 10
Notes:
SCU Page | Course Evaluations Page
| Search Database | General
Help
1994-1995 : Fall | Winter | Spring | Summer
1995-1996
: Fall | Winter | Spring | Summer
1996-1997
: Fall | Winter | Spring | Summer
1997-1998
: Fall | Winter | Spring | Summer
Maintainer: EvalsManager evalmgr@www.scu.edu
Last
changed: 31 July 2000
© Copyright 1995 Santa Clara University