Please read the usage disclaimer for Course Evaluations.

Engineering
Fall Quarter 1999

ENGR 019

TECHNOLOGICAL ETHICS


Course Information

Section Number: 17334
Instructor: NEIL QUINN
Location: CPPAE 128
Class times: 13:00 - 14:05
Class Days: MWF
Credits (hi/lo): 04.0 - 00.0
Enrollment: 11

Student Responses:

Questions 1 through 11 are rated on a 5-point scale which described the instructor's teaching procedures:
         -1-     -2-     -3-     -4-     -5-     Total  Mean  Variance  StdDev

1. The instructor presents class material clearly
           0       0       0       5       4        9   4.44    0.25    0.50

2. The course is well organized
           0       0       1       2       7       10   4.60    0.44    0.66

3. The instructor appears well prepared for class
           0       0       1       1       8       10   4.70    0.41    0.64

4. The instructor demonstrates an interest in students
           0       0       1       1       8       10   4.70    0.41    0.64

5. The instructor is available to students during posted office hours (Respond only if you have tried to contact the instructor during office hours)
           0       0       0       3       3        6   4.50    0.25    0.50

6. The instructor takes care to assure him/herself by tests, questions, discussions, etc. that the students are comprehending the subject
           0       0       2       3       5       10   4.30    0.61    0.78

7. The instructor appears to be knowledgable in the subject
           0       0       1       3       6       10   4.50    0.45    0.67

8. The instructor appears to enjoy teaching
           0       0       2       1       7       10   4.50    0.65    0.81

9. The instructor encourages the students to ask questions and/or express opinions
           0       0       1       2       7       10   4.60    0.44    0.66

10. The course has contributed to my capacity for critical evaluation
           0       1       1       1       7       10   4.40    1.04    1.02

11. The course has stimulated me to do independent thinking
           0       1       2       1       6       10   4.20    1.16    1.08

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


Questions 13 through 17 use different scales. The response scale is listed above each question.
12. The work load for this course in relation to other courses I have taken at this university is:
         much            about           much
         lighter lighter same    heavier heavier Total  Mean  Variance  StdDev

           0       1       6       1       1        9   3.22    0.62    0.79

13. My college at Santa Clara is:
         science human.  engnr.  business

           2       0       8       0               10   2.60    0.64    0.80

14. My status at Santa Clara is:
                         junior  frosh
         other   grad    sr.     soph

           0       0       5       4                9   3.44    0.25    0.50

15. My primary reason for taking this course was:
                 req'd   electv  req'd
         free    non-    for     major
         electv  major   reqm't  course

           0       1       3       5                9   3.44    0.47    0.68

16. My cumulative Santa Clara grade point average is:
         below   2.79    3.29    4.0
         2.3     to 2.3  to 2.8  to 3.3

           0       0       3       2                5   3.40    0.24    0.49

17. What percentage of class time were you in attendance?
         below   74%     89%     100%
         50%     to 50%  to 75%  to 90%

           0       0       0       8                8   4.00    0.00    0.00

Number of response cards read: 10

Notes:


SCU Page | Course Evaluations Page | Search Database | General Help

1994-1995 : Fall | Winter | Spring | Summer
1995-1996 : Fall | Winter | Spring | Summer
1996-1997 : Fall | Winter | Spring | Summer
1997-1998 : Fall | Winter | Spring | Summer

Maintainer: EvalsManager evalmgr@www.scu.edu
Last changed: 31 July 2000
© Copyright 1995 Santa Clara University