


Please read the usage disclaimer
for Course Evaluations.
Engineering
Winter Quarter 2002
ENGR 19
Ethics in Technology
Course Information
Section Number: 20483
Instructor:
Quinn Jr,Neil R
Location: BANNA 101
Class times: 09:15 -
10:20
Class Days: MWF
Credits (hi/lo): 4.00 -
4.00
Enrollment: 38
Student Responses:
Questions 1 through 11 are rated on a 5-point
scale which described the instructor's teaching procedures:
-1- -2- -3- -4- -5- Total Mean Variance StdDev
1.
The instructor presents class material clearly
0 1 3 14 20 38 4.39 0.55 0.74
2.
The course is well organized
0 1 5 7 25 38 4.47 0.67 0.82
3.
The instructor appears well prepared for class
0 1 3 10 24 38 4.50 0.57 0.75
4.
The instructor demonstrates an interest in students
1 1 3 14 18 37 4.27 0.85 0.92
5.
The instructor is available to students during posted office hours (Respond
only if you have tried to contact the instructor during office hours)
0 0 4 4 10 18 4.33 0.67 0.82
6.
The instructor takes care to assure him/herself by tests, questions,
discussions, etc. that the students are comprehending the subject
0 3 8 13 12 36 3.94 0.89 0.94
7.
The instructor appears to be knowledgable in the subject
1 0 1 12 23 37 4.51 0.63 0.79
8.
The instructor appears to enjoy teaching
1 1 1 10 24 37 4.49 0.79 0.89
9.
The instructor encourages the students to ask questions and/or express
opinions
0 0 5 9 23 37 4.49 0.52 0.72
10.
The course has contributed to my capacity for critical evaluation
0 2 7 12 16 37 4.14 0.82 0.91
11.
The course has stimulated me to do independent thinking
1 1 4 17 14 37 4.14 0.82 0.91
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
Questions 13 through 17 use different scales. The response
scale is listed above each question.
12. The work load for this
course in relation to other courses I have taken at this university is:
much about much
lighter lighter same heavier heavier Total Mean Variance StdDev
1 15 18 1 1 36 2.61 0.52 0.72
13.
My college at Santa Clara is:
science human. engnr. business
4 1 32 0 37 2.76 0.40 0.63
14.
My status at Santa Clara is:
junior frosh
other grad sr. soph
0 0 28 8 36 3.22 0.17 0.42
15.
My primary reason for taking this course was:
req'd electv req'd
free non- for major
electv major reqm't course
1 7 21 8 37 2.97 0.51 0.72
16.
My cumulative Santa Clara grade point average is:
below 2.79 3.29 4.0
2.3 to 2.3 to 2.8 to 3.3
1 9 10 16 36 3.14 0.79 0.89
17.
What percentage of class time were you in attendance?
below 74% 89% 100%
50% to 50% to 75% to 90%
0 0 2 35 37 3.95 0.05 0.23
Number
of response cards read: 38
Notes:
SCU Page | Course Evaluations Page
| Search Database | General
Help
1994-1995 : Fall | Winter | Spring | Summer
1995-1996
: Fall | Winter | Spring | Summer
1996-1997
: Fall | Winter | Spring | Summer
1997-1998
: Fall | Winter | Spring | Summer
1998-1999
: Fall | Winter | Spring | Summer
1999-2000
: Fall | Winter | Spring | Summer
2000-2001
: Fall
Maintainer: EvalsManager evalmgr@www.scu.edu
Last
changed: 22 April 2002
© Copyright 1995 Santa Clara University