


Please read the usage disclaimer
for Course Evaluations.
Engineering
Spring Quarter 2002
ENGR 19
Technological Ethics
Course Information
Section Number: 22523
Instructor:
Quinn Jr,Neil R
Location: BANNA 105
Class times: 11:45 -
12:50
Class Days: MWF
Credits (hi/lo): 4.00 -
4.00
Enrollment: 24
Student Responses:
Questions 1 through 11 are rated on a 5-point
scale which described the instructor's teaching procedures:
-1- -2- -3- -4- -5- Total Mean Variance StdDev
1.
The instructor presents class material clearly
0 0 0 10 13 23 4.57 0.25 0.50
2.
The course is well organized
0 0 0 4 18 22 4.82 0.15 0.39
3.
The instructor appears well prepared for class
0 0 0 3 19 22 4.86 0.12 0.34
4.
The instructor demonstrates an interest in students
0 0 5 6 11 22 4.27 0.65 0.81
5.
The instructor is available to students during posted office hours (Respond
only if you have tried to contact the instructor during office hours)
0 0 1 2 7 10 4.60 0.44 0.66
6.
The instructor takes care to assure him/herself by tests, questions,
discussions, etc. that the students are comprehending the subject
0 2 5 10 6 23 3.87 0.81 0.90
7.
The instructor appears to be knowledgable in the subject
0 0 3 5 15 23 4.52 0.51 0.71
8.
The instructor appears to enjoy teaching
0 0 1 4 17 22 4.73 0.29 0.54
9.
The instructor encourages the students to ask questions and/or express
opinions
0 0 0 10 12 22 4.55 0.25 0.50
10.
The course has contributed to my capacity for critical evaluation
0 3 1 8 9 21 4.10 1.04 1.02
11.
The course has stimulated me to do independent thinking
0 3 1 9 8 21 4.05 1.00 1.00
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
Questions 13 through 17 use different scales. The response
scale is listed above each question.
12. The work load for this
course in relation to other courses I have taken at this university is:
much about much
lighter lighter same heavier heavier Total Mean Variance StdDev
0 10 11 1 0 22 2.59 0.33 0.58
13.
My college at Santa Clara is:
science human. engnr. business
3 1 17 0 21 2.67 0.51 0.71
14.
My status at Santa Clara is:
junior frosh
other grad sr. soph
0 0 11 10 21 3.48 0.25 0.50
15.
My primary reason for taking this course was:
req'd electv req'd
free non- for major
electv major reqm't course
0 2 17 2 21 3.00 0.19 0.44
16.
My cumulative Santa Clara grade point average is:
below 2.79 3.29 4.0
2.3 to 2.3 to 2.8 to 3.3
1 1 9 11 22 3.36 0.60 0.77
17.
What percentage of class time were you in attendance?
below 74% 89% 100%
50% to 50% to 75% to 90%
0 0 0 21 21 4.00 0.00 0.00
Number
of response cards read: 23
Notes:
SCU Page | Course Evaluations Page
| Search Database | General
Help
1994-1995 : Fall | Winter | Spring | Summer
1995-1996
: Fall | Winter | Spring | Summer
1996-1997
: Fall | Winter | Spring | Summer
1997-1998
: Fall | Winter | Spring | Summer
1998-1999
: Fall | Winter | Spring | Summer
1999-2000
: Fall | Winter | Spring | Summer
2000-2001
: Fall
Maintainer: EvalsManager evalmgr@www.scu.edu
Last
changed: 22 October 2002
© Copyright 1995 Santa Clara University