Please
read the usage
disclaimer for Course Evaluations.
Engineering
Winter Quarter 2003
ENGR 19
Technological Ethics
Course Information
Section Number: 29419
Instructor:
Quinn Jr,Neil R
Location: BANNA 105
Class times: : - :
Class Days: TR
Credits (hi/lo): 4.00 -
4.00
Enrollment: 28
The numerical data you are viewing reflects the combination of
data from this course and other courses. Please see the Notes
section at the end of this document for more information.
Student Responses:
Questions 1 through 11 are rated on a 5-point
scale which described the instructor's teaching procedures:
-1- -2- -3- -4- -5- Total Mean Variance StdDev
1.
The instructor presents class material clearly
0 0 0 7 20 27 4.74 0.19 0.44
2.
The course is well organized
0 0 1 4 22 27 4.78 0.25 0.50
3.
The instructor appears well prepared for class
0 0 0 4 23 27 4.85 0.13 0.36
4.
The instructor demonstrates an interest in students
0 0 1 5 21 27 4.74 0.27 0.52
5.
The instructor is available to students during posted office hours (Respond
only if you have tried to contact the instructor during office hours)
0 0 0 0 11 11 5.00 0.00 0.00
6.
The instructor takes care to assure him/herself by tests, questions,
discussions, etc. that the students are comprehending the subject
0 1 4 6 16 27 4.37 0.75 0.87
7.
The instructor appears to be knowledgable in the subject
0 0 0 2 25 27 4.93 0.07 0.26
8.
The instructor appears to enjoy teaching
0 0 0 2 25 27 4.93 0.07 0.26
9.
The instructor encourages the students to ask questions and/or express
opinions
0 0 0 9 18 27 4.67 0.22 0.47
10.
The course has contributed to my capacity for critical evaluation
0 0 4 6 17 27 4.48 0.55 0.74
11.
The course has stimulated me to do independent thinking
0 1 4 6 16 27 4.37 0.75 0.87
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
Questions 13 through 17 use different scales. The response
scale is listed above each question.
12. The work load for this
course in relation to other courses I have taken at this university is:
much about much
lighter lighter same heavier heavier Total Mean Variance StdDev
3 11 11 2 0 27 2.44 0.62 0.79
13.
My college at Santa Clara is:
science human. engnr. business
4 2 19 1 26 2.65 0.61 0.78
14.
My status at Santa Clara is:
junior frosh
other grad sr. soph
1 7 5 13 26 3.15 0.90 0.95
15.
My primary reason for taking this course was:
req'd electv req'd
free non- for major
electv major reqm't course
3 2 15 6 26 2.92 0.76 0.87
16.
My cumulative Santa Clara grade point average is:
below 2.79 3.29 4.0
2.3 to 2.3 to 2.8 to 3.3
0 5 12 8 25 3.12 0.51 0.71
17.
What percentage of class time were you in attendance?
below 74% 89% 100%
50% to 50% to 75% to 90%
0 0 0 25 25 4.00 0.00 0.00
Number
of response cards read: 27
Notes:
- Combined results:
The results you are viewing reflect the
combination of two or more courses. Usually, this is due to cross-listings or
lab courses. The courses that were combined to give the data above are:
- ENGR 19 [#29419]: Technological Ethics taught by Quinn Jr,Neil R
- ENGR 301 [#29569]: Ethics in Technology taught by Quinn Jr,Neil R
SCU Homepage | Course Evaluations page | Search database | General Help
02-03 Evaluations: Fall | Winter |
Spring
| Summer
01-02 Evaluations: Fall | Winter |
Spring
| Summer
00-01 Evaluations: Fall | Winter |
Spring
| Summer
99-00 Evaluations: Fall | Winter |
Spring
| Summer
98-99 Evaluations: Fall | Winter |
Spring
| Summer
97-98 Evaluations: Fall | Winter |
Spring
| Summer
96-97 Evaluations: Fall | Winter |
Spring
| Summer
95-96 Evaluations: Fall | Winter |
Spring
| Summer
94-95 Evaluations: Fall | Winter |
Spring
| Summer
Maintainer: EvalsManager evalmgr@www.scu.edu
Last
changed: 29 August 2003
© Copyright 1995-2003 Santa Clara University