

Please
read the usage
disclaimer for Course Evaluations.
Engineering
Spring Quarter 2000
ENGR 19
Technological Ethics
Course Information
Section Number: 71157
Instructor:
Quinn, Neil
Location: ARTS 128
Class times: 09:15 -
10:20
Class Days: MWF
Credits (hi/lo): 4.00 -
4.00
Enrollment: 12
Student Responses:
Questions 1 through 11 are rated on a 5-point
scale which described the instructor's teaching procedures:
-1- -2- -3- -4- -5- Total Mean Variance StdDev
1.
The instructor presents class material clearly
0 0 1 2 8 11 4.64 0.41 0.64
2.
The course is well organized
0 1 0 5 5 11 4.27 0.74 0.86
3.
The instructor appears well prepared for class
0 0 0 5 6 11 4.55 0.25 0.50
4.
The instructor demonstrates an interest in students
0 0 1 2 8 11 4.64 0.41 0.64
5.
The instructor is available to students during posted office hours (Respond
only if you have tried to contact the instructor during office hours)
0 0 1 0 3 4 4.50 0.75 0.87
6.
The instructor takes care to assure him/herself by tests, questions,
discussions, etc. that the students are comprehending the subject
0 0 4 4 2 10 3.80 0.56 0.75
7.
The instructor appears to be knowledgable in the subject
0 0 0 3 8 11 4.73 0.20 0.45
8.
The instructor appears to enjoy teaching
0 0 0 7 4 11 4.36 0.23 0.48
9.
The instructor encourages the students to ask questions and/or express
opinions
0 0 0 3 8 11 4.73 0.20 0.45
10.
The course has contributed to my capacity for critical evaluation
0 1 0 6 4 11 4.18 0.69 0.83
11.
The course has stimulated me to do independent thinking
0 0 3 4 4 11 4.09 0.63 0.79
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
Questions 13 through 17 use different scales. The response
scale is listed above each question.
12. The work load for this
course in relation to other courses I have taken at this university is:
much about much
lighter lighter same heavier heavier Total Mean Variance StdDev
0 6 4 1 0 11 2.55 0.43 0.66
13.
My college at Santa Clara is:
science human. engnr. business
2 0 9 0 11 2.64 0.60 0.77
14.
My status at Santa Clara is:
junior frosh
other grad sr. soph
0 0 5 6 11 3.55 0.25 0.50
15.
My primary reason for taking this course was:
req'd electv req'd
free non- for major
electv major reqm't course
0 2 5 4 11 3.18 0.51 0.72
16.
My cumulative Santa Clara grade point average is:
below 2.79 3.29 4.0
2.3 to 2.3 to 2.8 to 3.3
3 4 1 3 11 2.36 1.32 1.15
17.
What percentage of class time were you in attendance?
below 74% 89% 100%
50% to 50% to 75% to 90%
0 0 2 9 11 3.82 0.15 0.39
Number
of response cards read: 11
Notes:
SCU Page | Course Evaluations Page
| Search Database | General
Help
1994-1995 : Fall | Winter | Spring | Summer
1995-1996
: Fall | Winter | Spring | Summer
1996-1997
: Fall | Winter | Spring | Summer
1997-1998
: Fall | Winter | Spring | Summer
Maintainer: EvalsManager evalmgr@www.scu.edu
Last
changed: 02 August 2000
© Copyright 1995 Santa Clara University