Please read the usage disclaimer for Course Evaluations.

Computer Engineering
Winter Quarter 2000

COEN 1

Undrstndng Digital Tech


Course Information

Section Number: 70255
Instructor: Quinn, Neil R
Location: ARTS 128
Class times: 09:15 - 10:20
Class Days: MWF
Credits (hi/lo): 4.0 - 4.00
Enrollment: 8

Student Responses:

Questions 1 through 11 are rated on a 5-point scale which described the instructor's teaching procedures:
         -1-     -2-     -3-     -4-     -5-     Total  Mean  Variance  StdDev

1. The instructor presents class material clearly
           0       0       2       5       0        7   3.71    0.20    0.45

2. The course is well organized
           0       1       2       4       0        7   3.43    0.53    0.73

3. The instructor appears well prepared for class
           0       0       4       2       1        7   3.57    0.53    0.73

4. The instructor demonstrates an interest in students
           0       1       1       2       3        7   4.00    1.14    1.07

5. The instructor is available to students during posted office hours (Respond only if you have tried to contact the instructor during office hours)
           0       0       2       1       2        5   4.00    0.80    0.89

6. The instructor takes care to assure him/herself by tests, questions, discussions, etc. that the students are comprehending the subject
           0       1       3       1       2        7   3.57    1.10    1.05

7. The instructor appears to be knowledgable in the subject
           0       0       1       0       6        7   4.71    0.49    0.70

8. The instructor appears to enjoy teaching
           0       0       2       1       4        7   4.29    0.78    0.88

9. The instructor encourages the students to ask questions and/or express opinions
           0       0       1       3       3        7   4.29    0.49    0.70

10. The course has contributed to my capacity for critical evaluation
           0       1       5       1       0        7   3.00    0.29    0.53

11. The course has stimulated me to do independent thinking
           0       1       3       3       0        7   3.29    0.49    0.70

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


Questions 13 through 17 use different scales. The response scale is listed above each question.
12. The work load for this course in relation to other courses I have taken at this university is:
         much            about           much
         lighter lighter same    heavier heavier Total  Mean  Variance  StdDev

           1       2       3       1       0        7   2.57    0.82    0.90

13. My college at Santa Clara is:
         science human.  engnr.  business

           6       1       0       0                7   1.14    0.12    0.35

14. My status at Santa Clara is:
                         junior  frosh
         other   grad    sr.     soph

           0       0       1       6                7   3.86    0.12    0.35

15. My primary reason for taking this course was:
                 req'd   electv  req'd
         free    non-    for     major
         electv  major   reqm't  course

           2       0       4       1                7   2.57    1.10    1.05

16. My cumulative Santa Clara grade point average is:
         below   2.79    3.29    4.0
         2.3     to 2.3  to 2.8  to 3.3

           0       2       2       3                7   3.14    0.69    0.83

17. What percentage of class time were you in attendance?
         below   74%     89%     100%
         50%     to 50%  to 75%  to 90%

           0       0       1       6                7   3.86    0.12    0.35

Number of response cards read: 7

Notes:


SCU Page | Course Evaluations Page | Search Database | General Help

1994-1995 : Fall | Winter | Spring | Summer
1995-1996 : Fall | Winter | Spring | Summer
1996-1997 : Fall | Winter | Spring | Summer
1997-1998 : Fall | Winter | Spring | Summer

Maintainer: EvalsManager evalmgr@www.scu.edu
Last changed: 4 OCT 2000
© Copyright 1995 Santa Clara University