

Please
read the usage
disclaimer for Course Evaluations.
Engineering
Fall Quarter 2000
ENGR 299
Engr Contemporary Issues
Course Information
Section Number: 11034
Instructor:
Quinn Jr,Neil R
Location: BANNA 230
Class times: 11:45 -
12:50
Class Days: MWF
Credits (hi/lo): 2.00 -
4.00
Enrollment: 5
Student Responses:
Questions 1 through 11 are rated on a 5-point
scale which described the instructor's teaching procedures:
-1- -2- -3- -4- -5- Total Mean Variance StdDev
1.
The instructor presents class material clearly
0 0 0 1 3 4 4.75 0.19 0.43
2.
The course is well organized
0 0 0 1 3 4 4.75 0.19 0.43
3.
The instructor appears well prepared for class
0 0 0 1 2 3 4.67 0.22 0.47
4.
The instructor demonstrates an interest in students
0 0 0 1 3 4 4.75 0.19 0.43
5.
The instructor is available to students during posted office hours (Respond
only if you have tried to contact the instructor during office hours)
0 0 0 0 3 3 5.00 0.00 0.00
6.
The instructor takes care to assure him/herself by tests, questions,
discussions, etc. that the students are comprehending the subject
0 0 0 2 2 4 4.50 0.25 0.50
7.
The instructor appears to be knowledgable in the subject
0 0 0 1 3 4 4.75 0.19 0.43
8.
The instructor appears to enjoy teaching
0 0 0 0 4 4 5.00 0.00 0.00
9.
The instructor encourages the students to ask questions and/or express
opinions
0 0 0 0 4 4 5.00 0.00 0.00
10.
The course has contributed to my capacity for critical evaluation
0 0 1 2 1 4 4.00 0.50 0.71
11.
The course has stimulated me to do independent thinking
0 0 0 3 1 4 4.25 0.19 0.43
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
Questions 13 through 17 use different scales. The response
scale is listed above each question.
12. The work load for this
course in relation to other courses I have taken at this university is:
much about much
lighter lighter same heavier heavier Total Mean Variance StdDev
1 0 2 1 0 4 2.75 1.19 1.09
13.
My college at Santa Clara is:
science human. engnr. business
0 0 4 0 4 3.00 0.00 0.00
14.
My status at Santa Clara is:
junior frosh
other grad sr. soph
0 4 0 0 4 2.00 0.00 0.00
15.
My primary reason for taking this course was:
req'd electv req'd
free non- for major
electv major reqm't course
0 1 2 1 4 3.00 0.50 0.71
16.
My cumulative Santa Clara grade point average is:
below 2.79 3.29 4.0
2.3 to 2.3 to 2.8 to 3.3
0 0 3 1 4 3.25 0.19 0.43
17.
What percentage of class time were you in attendance?
below 74% 89% 100%
50% to 50% to 75% to 90%
0 0 0 4 4 4.00 0.00 0.00
Number
of response cards read: 4
Notes:
SCU Page | Course Evaluations Page
| Search Database | General
Help
1994-1995 : Fall | Winter | Spring | Summer
1995-1996
: Fall | Winter | Spring | Summer
1996-1997
: Fall | Winter | Spring | Summer
1997-1998
: Fall | Winter | Spring | Summer
1998-1999
: Fall | Winter | Spring | Summer
1999-2000
: Fall | Winter | Spring | Summer
2000-2001
: Fall
Maintainer: EvalsManager evalmgr@www.scu.edu
Last
changed: 8 February 2001
© Copyright 1995 Santa Clara University