Please read the usage disclaimer for Course Evaluations.

Engineering
Fall Quarter 2000

ENGR 299

Engr Contemporary Issues


Course Information

Section Number: 11034
Instructor: Quinn Jr,Neil R
Location: BANNA 230
Class times: 11:45 - 12:50
Class Days: MWF
Credits (hi/lo): 2.00 - 4.00
Enrollment: 5

Student Responses:

Questions 1 through 11 are rated on a 5-point scale which described the instructor's teaching procedures:
         -1-     -2-     -3-     -4-     -5-     Total  Mean  Variance  StdDev

1. The instructor presents class material clearly
           0       0       0       1       3        4   4.75    0.19    0.43

2. The course is well organized
           0       0       0       1       3        4   4.75    0.19    0.43

3. The instructor appears well prepared for class
           0       0       0       1       2        3   4.67    0.22    0.47

4. The instructor demonstrates an interest in students
           0       0       0       1       3        4   4.75    0.19    0.43

5. The instructor is available to students during posted office hours (Respond only if you have tried to contact the instructor during office hours)
           0       0       0       0       3        3   5.00    0.00    0.00

6. The instructor takes care to assure him/herself by tests, questions, discussions, etc. that the students are comprehending the subject
           0       0       0       2       2        4   4.50    0.25    0.50

7. The instructor appears to be knowledgable in the subject
           0       0       0       1       3        4   4.75    0.19    0.43

8. The instructor appears to enjoy teaching
           0       0       0       0       4        4   5.00    0.00    0.00

9. The instructor encourages the students to ask questions and/or express opinions
           0       0       0       0       4        4   5.00    0.00    0.00

10. The course has contributed to my capacity for critical evaluation
           0       0       1       2       1        4   4.00    0.50    0.71

11. The course has stimulated me to do independent thinking
           0       0       0       3       1        4   4.25    0.19    0.43

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


Questions 13 through 17 use different scales. The response scale is listed above each question.
12. The work load for this course in relation to other courses I have taken at this university is:
         much            about           much
         lighter lighter same    heavier heavier Total  Mean  Variance  StdDev

           1       0       2       1       0        4   2.75    1.19    1.09

13. My college at Santa Clara is:
         science human.  engnr.  business

           0       0       4       0                4   3.00    0.00    0.00

14. My status at Santa Clara is:
                         junior  frosh
         other   grad    sr.     soph

           0       4       0       0                4   2.00    0.00    0.00

15. My primary reason for taking this course was:
                 req'd   electv  req'd
         free    non-    for     major
         electv  major   reqm't  course

           0       1       2       1                4   3.00    0.50    0.71

16. My cumulative Santa Clara grade point average is:
         below   2.79    3.29    4.0
         2.3     to 2.3  to 2.8  to 3.3

           0       0       3       1                4   3.25    0.19    0.43

17. What percentage of class time were you in attendance?
         below   74%     89%     100%
         50%     to 50%  to 75%  to 90%

           0       0       0       4                4   4.00    0.00    0.00

Number of response cards read: 4

Notes:


SCU Page | Course Evaluations Page | Search Database | General Help

1994-1995 : Fall | Winter | Spring | Summer
1995-1996 : Fall | Winter | Spring | Summer
1996-1997 : Fall | Winter | Spring | Summer
1997-1998 : Fall | Winter | Spring | Summer
1998-1999 : Fall | Winter | Spring | Summer
1999-2000 : Fall | Winter | Spring | Summer
2000-2001 : Fall

Maintainer: EvalsManager evalmgr@www.scu.edu
Last changed: 8 February 2001
© Copyright 1995 Santa Clara University